From the Editor

4/17/09

Tea Party coverage

Coverage of the recent Tea Party rallies provided another obstacle course for the media to navigate. I first heard about the event in the Media Critics section of roguecurrent.com, where one of the posters said he'd be surprised if the media would cover the event. I told the poster we were interested in covering it and that if he could put us in touch with organizers, we would do just that. He did and we did, running a front page story the day before the event and a front page story the day after, plus stories, photos and videos on mailtribune.com.

The first comment we got back from the advance story was that we were obviously biased against the event. Huh? OK, I admit I was confused. Turns out that an editor (me) changed the words "national politicians" into "President Barack Obama and Congress." I thought I was making the story clearer, because I had seen other coverage (yes, even on Fox News) that showed the message was aimed at the White House and Congress. I was wrong, though, to make that assumption, as I told the woman whose paraphrased words (not direct quotes) I had changed. An innocent mistake on my part, but in her view part of the media conspiracy to distort the news.

Turns out the organizers were making a very concerted effort to portray this as a non-partisan event, even if most of the creators and participants were Republican and/or conservative (Dick Armey, Tom DeLay, Michael Steele, Newt Gingrich, Fox News, etc.) I had unknowingly stepped in the middle of that.

With that auspicious start, we set off to cover the event. Our reporter, Damian Mann, was greeted with numerous comments or questions about his impartiality. He did his job, covered the story in a very straight-forward manner and, in the end, received compliments from some of the organizers and participants. He did say, however, that he got some criticism from non-conservatives that the coverage was "excessive." Can't keep everybody happy.

I clearly made a mistake in changing the wording in Damian's story. Even if I didn't really believe this was a strictly non-partisan effort, a sentiment we expressed in an editorial on Wednesday, my editing changed the comments made by the event supporter, even if they were only paraphrased comments.  Lesson learned.

But as to the comments that it was an evidence of biased coverage, I say not guilty. Sometimes a mistake is just a mistake.

 

Comments (14)

  • 4/21/09 - IronkettleranchHey Bob - Glad to see you are taking "baby steps" on your path to accountability - I want to encourage you to read the MT retraction printed on April 15th (2nd page) that corrects the misquote by Damian Mann - I believe what was actually said was U.S. Government NOT U.S. Politicians and Congress. Remember Bob, you are in a position of public trust. The citizens and subscribers deserve the truth, not your version of it.
  • 4/21/09 - ERICWith this kind of cloud hanging over American citizens, the story is not about tea party or taxes, its about the hand of big brother over reaching its grasp! Single-page confidential directive issued by the FBI headquarters in Washington, DC (FBIHQ) was sent to each of the 56 field offices located across the United States on or about March 23, 2009, instructing the Special Agents in Charge (SACs) of those offices to verify the date, time and location of each TEA Party within their region and... [Full Comment]
  • 4/21/09 - BobI thought your post-rally article was relatively objective, and although my sensibilities weren't offended by your revision to "Obama and Congress", it did fall short of absolute accuracy. My perception is that the Tea Party protests were probably inevitable. I know that I would have been there if President Bush had taken it to this level, especially topped off with all the potential government control that seems imminent. It just happens that our current political leadership (questionable... [Full Comment]
  • 4/21/09 - OregonjaybirdWhy wouldn't the organizers think you would be dumb enough to cover a manufactured news story and report it as a non-partisan, grassroots event? Your record speaks for itself. You cover these events because you fear being singled out by conservative talk radio and the rest of the mob. Heaven forbid someone lift up the curtain and do some actual investigative reporting. No, you decide it better to just send out a photographer and a sponge and slap the crap on the front page. BTW: The Republica... [Full Comment]
  • 4/21/09 - AirForceBratAs the organizer of the Vogel Plaza gathering, and one who was interviewed for Damien Mann's story, I have to say that I was not only slightly misquoted in the article, but my comments were also taken out of context. I very much resented the Editorial in the next day's paper stating that organizers were "taking pains" to make this seem a bi-partisan event (I paraphrase here.) I took no pains to do anything other than give Mr. Mann my opinion. And my opinion stands. The mess we're in is the... [Full Comment]
  • 4/20/09 - griz51Broadway, How would you describe past liberal events such as the (so called) Million Man March? Would you say that that event was fueled by the liberal media and not truly a "grassroots" happening?
  • 4/20/09 - MarkJJI've never picked up a picket sign in my life, but I had one in my hand in front of the Jos. Co. Court House April 15th. 51 yrs old. During the presidential campain the MT, along with most all of the Oregon METO newspapers were decidedly Obama supporters. All one has to do is look at the editorials and columnists for a blind view of that. Obama mania has subsided to the reality of politics as usual and the realization of our inability to pay the bills. Meanwhile,no matter which journalist... [Full Comment]
  • 4/20/09 - Piccadilly JimTo Broadway: NO ONE called me to attend the tea party. You can choose to believe me or not... that is your right. However, don't so casually dismiss the concerns of those fellow citizens around you who are worried about the enormous spending program our federal government has embarked upon. And PLEASE... stop labeling all those who disagree with you. It is there right to demonstrate just as much as those whom you agree with. Stop the labeling. It's an old trick to distort what the opposition... [Full Comment]
  • 4/19/09 - BroadwayThese tea parties are not spontaneous, grass roots or non-partisan. They are fueled by FOX news and egged on by ultra-Rightists like Newt Gingrich. Where were these people (who are now getting a tax CUT under Obama)when Bush and the GOP were handing our dough to Wall Street?
  • 4/19/09 - MarkPerhaps if you would do more research before blabbering, your article would have been better received. While the protests did turn into partisan events at times, that was not the intention. RNC Chair Michael Steele asked to speak at one gathering, and was denied permission in the interests of keeping it non-partisan. We do understand that the MMT is a liberal publication though, and you can't help but run to the defense of President Obama any more than you can avoid screaming "Bush did it" at... [Full Comment]
  • 4/19/09 - Kim CThank you for trying to give a fair and balanced report about this event. Unfortunately, your attempt to do the right thing, journalistically speaking, was thwarted by the same rabid attitude that has hamstrung our politics in this country for at least the last year. We are suffering from the opposite of good journalism, where one covers the facts and then reports them, so that the rest of us may figure out how we see any one issue with regard to the facts at hand. Instead, the goal of... [Full Comment]
  • 4/19/09 - Paul R. HuardIn life, I can count on three things: Death, taxes, and the Mail Tribune missing the point. Although I give Hunter and his crew middling marks for both their pre-party and spot news coverage of the Medford Tea Party, their obsession with casting the protests as wholly-owned subsidaries of the Republican Party baffles me. Excuse me, but did the esteemed Mr. Hunter or any of reporters actually attend the event? Protesters there were no doubt frustrated with the Obama administration's thirst for... [Full Comment]
  • 4/19/09 - Hehehe...Looks like your paper's reputation precedes itself. While your focus in this blog seems to be specific to the "tea party," it is obvious that the past reporting of you and your staff has gained a reputation -- one that doesn't appear to be flattering.
  • 4/19/09 - L. AngelI thought the M-T coverage was fair and even-handed. Damian Mann wrote an accurate account of a very successful event.
To our readers
We're in the process of upgrading the software behind our blogs, in large part to add new features and capabilities. As part of this process, we've changed the location of our RSS feeds. To subscribe to this blog via RSS, please update your feed readers to point to http://feeds.feedburner.com/mail-tribune-editor. Or simply unsubscribe from the old feed and then add the new feed as a new subscription.
Send us a question
Got a question about the workings of the Mail Tribune? Send an e-mail to Editor Bob Hunter, and he'll consider the topic as a subject of this blog. Be sure to include your name and a daytime contact number so we can follow up as necessary.
About the author
bHunter

Bob Hunter is the editor of the Mail Tribune and as such gets a whole lot of calls and e-mails about a whole lot of things involving the newspaper. This blog will give him (and other editors) a chance to discuss some of the issues that come up regularly as well as some of the crazy things that come at us from out of the blue.


Since he’s not here 24-7, other editors will also occasionally add their thoughts to the blog. Readers are invited to join in the conversation by posting their comments. If you have ideas for a topic you’d like to see addressed in this blog, e-mail it to bhunter@mailtribune.com.

«November 2009»
SMTWTFS
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293012345
Subscribe